Why “why?” is flawed.

When asked why, you have to choose a story and a context.

Why did I write this?

  • Because I’m frustrated about this word.
  • Because I want people to read my blog and understand me better?
  • Because neurons in my brain fired in a way that made my fingers dance over my keyboard which caused this blog post to be written.
  • Because I was motivated to do so.
  • Because it filled my mind and I want to get it out in a clear and understandable way for myself.
  • Because I want people to stop using  it in unhelpful ways.
  • Because I want to communicate better and I want people to understand each other.

The answer is not one. All of the statements might be valid, and yet when we ask why we usually want a definite answer. I can’t give you all reasons without creating an infinite list of these causalities. And to give you a truly accurate answer I must explain all  the history of what happened in this world since the start of time and existence itself.

When we ask why we really say: “Tell a convincing story. What made it happen?”

“Give me a satisfying answer”

So any answer to a why question will always be:

  • a constructed story
  • a simplification of reality
  • based on belief

Why would I use why then?

It can be used to make someone reflect and formalize their own reasoning.

It can be used to obtain indications of someone’s perspective.


One thought on “Why “why?” is flawed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s